View source for Blog:Docmoates/behavior-change-what-psychology-says-about-forming-and-breaking-habits

Habits account for a remarkable proportion of daily behavior. Research by Wendy Wood and colleagues finds that approximately 43 percent of daily behaviors are habitual, performed regularly in the same contexts without deliberate intention. Understanding how habits form, how they are maintained, and how they can be changed is among the most practically relevant areas of psychological science, with applications from clinical psychology to public health to personal development. The habit loop, popularized by Charles Duhigg, describes the basic structure of habit formation: a cue that triggers a routine behavior, which produces a reward that reinforces the association between cue and routine. Neuroscience research has identified the basal ganglia as central to habit formation and execution, with habit circuits developing through repetition that moves behavior control from prefrontal, deliberate processing to automatic subcortical processing. Once a habit is formed, the behavior can be triggered by environmental cues with little conscious intention. Implementation intentions, which specify when, where, and how a person will perform an intended behavior, are among the most well-supported behavior change techniques in the psychological literature. Research by Peter Gollwitzer shows that forming specific plans for behavior, rather than simply intending to do something, significantly increases follow-through. Implementation intentions appear to work by linking intended behaviors to specific situational cues that can automatically trigger the behavior without requiring conscious deliberation. Habit formation research has documented that the time required for a behavior to become automatic varies widely, from as few as 18 days to over 250 days in a study by Phillippa Lally and colleagues, depending on the complexity of the behavior, individual differences, and consistency of context. The popular claim that habits form in 21 days is not supported by the empirical literature. More consistent findings are that greater consistency in the context of behavior leads to faster automatization, and that missing occasional days does not substantially slow habit formation. Cue-routine-reward relationships make habits difficult to break through willpower alone, since the automatic triggering of habitual behavior is not easily overridden by conscious intention. More effective habit change strategies focus on identifying and modifying the cues that trigger unwanted habits, substituting new routines that produce similar rewards, or changing environments to reduce cue exposure. Research consistently shows that environmental change is more effective than willpower-based strategies for breaking unwanted habits. The role of context in habit maintenance and change is significant. Habits are context-specific: behaviors that have become automatic in one context may require deliberate intention when performed in a new environment. This contextual specificity is both a challenge and an opportunity. Habitual smokers may find it easier to quit when they change locations, and people transitioning to new environments, after a move or at the start of a new school year, may find it easier to adopt new health behaviors because old habits are less automatically triggered. Motivational factors interact with habit processes in complex ways. Research on self-determination theory, developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, finds that behaviors are more likely to be internalized and sustained when they are driven by intrinsic motivation, the inherent satisfaction of the activity, rather than external rewards. External rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation for activities people already find inherently satisfying, a phenomenon called the overjustification effect. This finding has implications for the design of behavior change programs that use incentives. Temptation bundling, a strategy studied by Katherine Milkman and colleagues, pairs intrinsically pleasurable activities with behaviors that require more motivation, such as listening to preferred audiobooks only while exercising. Research on temptation bundling shows meaningful increases in targeted behavior and subjective enjoyment of the bundled activities. The strategy leverages existing motivation for pleasurable activities to provide immediate reward for effortful ones. Self-monitoring, the systematic tracking of target behaviors, is one of the most effective and broadly applicable behavior change techniques. Research meta-analyses find that self-monitoring reliably increases target behaviors across health and performance domains. The mechanism appears to involve both increased awareness of behavior frequency and the motivational effects of seeing progress toward goals. Digital health technologies have substantially expanded the ease and granularity of self-monitoring, and their integration with behavior change programs is an active area of research.

----
''Originally published September 25, 2018 on [https://docmoates.com/blog/behavior-change-what-psychology-says-about-forming-and-breaking-habits/ docmoates.com].''