View source for Blog:Docmoates/technology-adoption-in-nonprofits-research-on-digital-transformation-and-capacity

Technology adoption in the nonprofit sector has been a persistent area of interest for researchers and practitioners who observe that many organizations lag behind private sector counterparts in their use of data systems, digital communication, constituent relationship management, and program management technology. Research on nonprofit technology adoption, the factors that constrain it, and the outcomes associated with more mature technology use has developed alongside the growing importance of digital tools to organizational effectiveness and constituent service. The technology capacity of nonprofit organizations varies enormously, from large national organizations with sophisticated data infrastructure, dedicated technology staff, and comprehensive digital systems, to small community organizations that track programs in spreadsheets and communicate with constituents primarily through personal relationships and word of mouth. Research on technology capacity in the sector finds that organization size, budget, age, and sector are all associated with technology maturity, with larger, better-funded, and more recently founded organizations generally showing higher technology adoption. Funding constraints are the most commonly cited barrier to technology adoption by nonprofit executives and staff. Research on nonprofit technology spending finds that organizations consistently underinvest in infrastructure relative to their operational needs, driven partly by donor preferences for program spending over administrative costs, partly by funder restrictions that limit how grants can be used for overhead, and partly by organizational cultures that prioritize immediate service delivery over investment in systems. The overhead myth, the misconception that nonprofit overhead spending is inherently wasteful rather than capacity-building, has discouraged investment in technology that would improve organizational effectiveness. Staff capacity is another significant constraint. Many nonprofit organizations lack staff with the technical skills to select, implement, and maintain modern technology systems, and the low salaries common in the sector make it difficult to recruit technology professionals who can command higher compensation in the private sector. Research on technology implementation in nonprofits finds that failed implementations are common and often attributable to inadequate change management, staff training, and technical support rather than to flaws in the technology itself. Data and evaluation capacity is a dimension of technology adoption that has received particular research attention as funders have increased expectations for data-driven program evaluation. Nonprofits are increasingly expected to collect, analyze, and report data on program outcomes, yet many organizations lack the data systems and staff capacity to do this consistently and credibly. Research on nonprofit evaluation capacity finds that a significant proportion of organizations report difficulty collecting and using data for program improvement, with technology gaps as a contributing factor alongside analytical skill shortages. Constituent relationship management systems, which allow organizations to track relationships with donors, volunteers, clients, and other stakeholders in a centralized database, are among the most impactful technologies for nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Research on CRM adoption and use in nonprofits finds that organizations with mature CRM systems show better donor retention, more effective fundraising, and improved constituent communication than those without. However, CRM implementation requires significant investment in staff training and data quality management, and research on CRM outcomes finds that poorly implemented systems produce poor results regardless of the underlying software. Funder investment in technology is one lever that research suggests could significantly improve sector-wide capacity. Foundations that provide unrestricted operating support, that specifically fund technology capacity building, and that allow overhead spending in grants enable organizations to invest in systems that improve effectiveness. Research on funder practices and grantee technology capacity finds associations between more flexible and infrastructure-supporting grants and better technology outcomes for recipient organizations. The Gates Foundation's investment in technology capacity building for nonprofits in the education sector is one example of funder-driven technology improvement that has been studied. Collaborative technology infrastructure, including shared platforms, pooled data systems, and sector-wide tools, is an approach that research suggests could reduce the per-organization cost of technology while improving interoperability across organizations working in the same issue areas. Collective approaches to technology that allow small organizations to access tools they could not individually afford have shown promise in specific contexts and represent a direction for sector-wide technology improvement that does not require every organization to independently solve the same technology challenges.

----
''Originally published July 30, 2019 on [https://docmoates.com/blog/technology-adoption-in-nonprofits-research-on-digital-transformation-and-capacity/ docmoates.com].''